Snozberry: Richard Clarke

This seems like a pretty biased article to me - nitpicking Clarke's story (which admitedly seems to be slightly embellished for interviews) to the point of trying to discredit him. If these guys were this critical of the Administration's misleading, fluctuating legalese they'd probably be calling them traitors by now!

I am somewhat surprised to see such a conservative viewpoint coming from Time. I don't read Time, well, ever - but it seems to me that they need a lesson on objectivity.

Posted by reds at March 25, 2004 01:07 PM

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://blog.beefstew.net/mt-cgi/mt-tb.cgi/40

Here's what others have to say about Richard Clarke - Liar?:

» from
...[read more]

Tracked: March 25, 2004 01:07 PM

I was amused at the Daily Show the other night doing a segment on all of this, talking about, ok, now the administration is talking about getting out the truth. Let's see what they say about the allegations! Then they showed clips from all of the admin's presh conferences where they stated nothing but spun pieces of information about clark, his career, and the fact that he has a book out now, but never said jack about anything clark had actually SAID.

interesting, no?

Posted by: redbeard at March 25, 2004 02:07 PM